The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publisher's journals is widely acknowledged to be inappropriate. This paper presents the reasons why that is so. It considers possible means whereby the practice could be subjected to control, and concludes that the primary regulatory vehicle is the Code of Research Conduct of the Association for Information Systems (AIS). The framework created by the original 2003 Code is described, and the extensions approved in principle by the AIS Council in December 2008 are shown to greatly enhance the discipline's ability to bring pressure to bear on publishers that misbehave in this way
When is it reasonable to reuse work of your own, particularly if it has already been published? And ...
The paper discusses the possibility of introducing quantitative and qualitative requirements on refe...
Self-plagiarism is one of the most controversial issues faced by participants in the publication p...
The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publi...
The practice of editorial self-referencing - journal editors requiring that authors include in the...
Editors have made requests of manuscript authors to carefully examine their reference lists and to i...
Publication of articles in so called “reputed” journals and achieving high citation counts for the p...
A recent and controversial issue in the academic publishing process is “forced journal self-citation...
This paper examines the common, and highly complex, practice of academic citation use. Inasmuch as...
Journal self-citation and its effect on impact factors is a much more controversial and hotly debate...
Much has been said about the ethics of requiring a submission to include a set number of citations/r...
This note highlights how journal self-citation practices substantially influence impact factorbased ...
The AIS Code of Research Conduct offers guidance in matters directly related to the research and pub...
This note highlights how journal self-citation practices substantially influence impact factor-based...
In this paper, we discuss the AIS Code of Research Conduct approved by AIS Council at its December ...
When is it reasonable to reuse work of your own, particularly if it has already been published? And ...
The paper discusses the possibility of introducing quantitative and qualitative requirements on refe...
Self-plagiarism is one of the most controversial issues faced by participants in the publication p...
The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publi...
The practice of editorial self-referencing - journal editors requiring that authors include in the...
Editors have made requests of manuscript authors to carefully examine their reference lists and to i...
Publication of articles in so called “reputed” journals and achieving high citation counts for the p...
A recent and controversial issue in the academic publishing process is “forced journal self-citation...
This paper examines the common, and highly complex, practice of academic citation use. Inasmuch as...
Journal self-citation and its effect on impact factors is a much more controversial and hotly debate...
Much has been said about the ethics of requiring a submission to include a set number of citations/r...
This note highlights how journal self-citation practices substantially influence impact factorbased ...
The AIS Code of Research Conduct offers guidance in matters directly related to the research and pub...
This note highlights how journal self-citation practices substantially influence impact factor-based...
In this paper, we discuss the AIS Code of Research Conduct approved by AIS Council at its December ...
When is it reasonable to reuse work of your own, particularly if it has already been published? And ...
The paper discusses the possibility of introducing quantitative and qualitative requirements on refe...
Self-plagiarism is one of the most controversial issues faced by participants in the publication p...